* Cryptorchid (non-specified) cases are animals found to be cryptorchid, but not diagnosed as either abdominal or inguinal.

Results

Almost 2.4 million dogs were seen in over 8 million visits at Banfield Pet Hospital in 2014, of which 540,183 (22.5%) were puppies. Table 2 lists the 5 most common congenital disorders noted for this year; the top three diagnoses were cryptorchidism (with 38.3 to 120.9 cases per 10,000 dogs diagnosed with one of these three conditions) followed by congenital deafness and portosystemic shunts. These two conditions were noticeably much rarer, with less than 9 and 3 cases per 10,000 dogs respectively. The top 5 congenital conditions did not change in rank since 2010, although (with the exception of portosystemic shunts) the prevalence for each increased from 2010 to 2014. All of the changes in prevalence were found to be statistically significant.

Reproductive conditions were more commonly diagnosed than any other congenital disorder (Table 3).Neurological conditions were a distant second and gastrointestinal and cardiovascular conditions even further third and fourth. The changes since 2010 were found to be statistically significant for the reproductive, gastrointestinal and endocrine categories. 

* The total numbers for cryptorchid cases in Table 2 is slightly more than the total number of dogs diagnosed with reproductive problems in Table 3, probably because in some instances a puppy was diagnosed initially as an abdominal cryptorchid, but the testicle descended to the inguinal region as the pup got older, or a non-specified cryptorchid was identified as being abdominal or inguinal at a subsequent visit.

Discussion 

Given the ease with which cryptorchidism is diagnosed, it is not surprising that this was the top condition identified. As Banfield hospitals are first opinion practices, it is possible that the other conditions listed in Table 1 are under-diagnosed or under-recorded, as many require referral to a specialist for further diagnostic evaluation. In addition, the review was limited by the standardized list of conditions available in the record system, so if a diagnosis is made but the condition is not listed (or is listed under a different name), the veterinarian may not record the diagnosis appropriately. Given that this study was limited to those cases where a congenital disorder was noted within the first year of life, the calculations may under-estimate the true prevalence for some disorders, as they may not be detected or appropriately diagnosed until the pet is older – the chosen age limit was for ease of data extraction and to ensure diagnosis most likely reflected a congenital origin.

The changes in prevalence estimates may reflect increased or decreased recording of a diagnosis in the Banfield system (although there is no known reason why this should be so), or they could be attributed to improved diagnostic capabilities and/or changes in evaluating breeding quality by some breeders and pet owners. It would seem that the varying prevalence does indeed reflect a genuine alteration in the occurrence of these conditions in young dogs, although the underlying reasons are not apparent.